Posts Tagged ‘reset workplace expetations’

Alignment Solutions Newsletter: How to Stop the Insanity of Unproductive Conversations

Wednesday, August 24th, 2016


How to Stop the Insanity
of Unproductive Conversations

Alignment solution: There are four simple techniques you can use to change your conversations from unproductive to productive.

Have you ever had the same conversation over and over again because an undesirable behavior or outcome failed to change? Perhaps it’s with an employee who consistently misses deadlines, promises to do better, then continues to be late. Maybe the conversation is with your kids when they don’t do their chores (again). The good news: you can stop this vicious cycle today by making a few simple changes.

One of my presentations last week at an international fire chiefs’ conference was called “Stop the Insanity of Public Safety Conversations: Change the Context.” In it I offered four simple techniques to help change unproductive conversations to productive ones – i.e., those that change an undesirable status quo. Although I can’t guarantee that you always will get the outcome you want, I can say they will get you out of the unproductive rut in which you find yourself. Bonus: the techniques work both inside and outside any kind of workplace.

Technique #1: Ask positive questions
The questions we ask are fateful: they point people in the direction in which they seek answers. If you ask negative questions, people find negative, unproductive responses. Similarly, positive questions will yield positive, productive answers. If you want people to come up with creative solutions, formulate positive questions.

Sample scenario: A project for a major client goes terribly wrong. Which set of questions is more likely to enable your team to devise a productive solution to ensure it doesn’t happen again?

1. You’ve done this kind of project successfully dozens of times. Why’d you mess up this time? Whose fault was this? How did you let this happen? What went wrong?

2. You’ve done this kind of project successfully dozens of times. What does it look like when you execute it perfectly? What do you do right? Who and what enables your success?

Technique #2: Change the question
Unproductive conversations often are the result of asking the wrong questions. Instead of answering such questions, respond by posing your own question that will guide the conversation to a more productive outcome.

Sample scenario: Executives at a retail store known for its exceptional customer service must cut costs. Which question is more likely to result in a thoughtful conversation about how to ensure the store retains its stellar reputation with customers?

3. How much should we cut the training budget this year?

4. What level of customer service do you (executives) want us to provide our customers this year?

Technique #3: Change the context or focus
Just as asking the wrong questions leads to unproductive conversations, so too does providing a context that the other person doesn’t care about, or views as a low priority. Re-frame the discussion by changing the focus or putting it into a context that matters to the other person.

Sample scenario: Despite all their training and discussions of why safety is important, some employees at a manufacturing plant still take shortcuts that jeopardize their safety. Which area of focus is more likely to result in a conversation that changes that behavior?

5. Safety: “Be safe out there!”

6. Courage: “Have the courage to be safe!”
(Thanks to Deputy Chief Mike Froelich, Sylvania Fire-EMS, for this quote)        

Technique #4: Change the level of the conversation
A common definition of “insanity” is doing the same thing over and over again, yet expecting different results. The authors of a book called Crucial Confrontations provide a technique to avoid engaging in repetitive discussions when the undesirable behavior persists: change the level of the conversation. Their contention is that there are three increasingly higher levels of conversation: content, commitment, and relationship. When a conversation doesn’t have the desired result, or enable movement toward that outcome, instead of sticking to the first (content) level, escalate it. (Though this suggestion is a variation on technique #3 above, I include it separately because it is a tremendously powerful tool.)

Sample scenario: A department manager consistently misses scheduled meetings with his employees, causing them to make embarrassing mistakes due to the delay in conveying important product information. Which example below is more likely to correct this undesirable behavior?

7. The executive’s conversation with the manager focuses on the pattern of missed meetings. The manager commits to changing the behavior (content). When the behavior doesn’t change, the executive repeats the previous conversation till the cows come home. The behavior still doesn’t change. 

8. The executive’s initial conversation with the manager is about the latter’s pattern of behavior. When the behavior doesn’t change, the second conversation focuses on the manager’s failure to deliver on his commitment. If the behavior still doesn’t change, the third conversation focuses on the harm to the relationship: the executive no longer can trust the manager because he repeatedly failed to keep his commitment.

Note: sometimes having the “content” level of conversation is enough to get the desired behavior; other times it’s necessary to have the “commitment” level of conversation. My experience is that it seldom is necessary to escalate the conversation to the “relationship” level.

Each of the four techniques described above can save you from the insanity of unproductive conversations. Choose the one that’s most relevant to the situation at hand. While it may not get you everything you want, at minimum it will result in a more productive use of your time and better results than you have experienced.


If you’d like to learn more about the benefits of using positive language, take a look at our article The Transformative Power of Appreciative Language. To find other articles and resources that may be of value to you, I invite you to visit my web site at  www.BusinessAlignmentStrategies.com and my blog at www.OptimizeBusinessResults.com


Alignment Solutions is a concise, bi-weekly newsletter written specifically to help organizational leaders optimize their business results. Your e-mail address is never shared with anyone for any reason. You may unsubscribe by clicking the link on the bottom of this e-mail.

Click here to Join Our Mailing List!

SM Icons
Line

© 2016 Pat Lynch. All rights reserved.

Alignment Solutions Newsletter: How to Increase the Likelihood of a Good Person-Job-Organization Fit

Wednesday, June 29th, 2016


How to Increase the Likelihood of a
Good Person-Job-Organization Fit

Alignment solution: To increase the likelihood of a good person-job-organization fit, provide candidates with a realistic job preview.

One often unrecognized fact about hiring and promotional processes is that a job interview is a two-way evaluation. That is, the candidates as well as the employer have the opportunity to assess the goodness-of-fit between themselves, the job, and the organization. In order for both sides to make informed decisions, however, the employer must provide all relevant information, both positive and negative. To do otherwise would be a disservice to all stakeholders as well as to the organization.

If asked why they decline to mention the down sides to a given job, most employers say they don’t want to scare off good candidates.

I’ve got news for them: they’re going to lose new hires who discover their expectations will not be met. On the other hand, new hires who are poor fits are likely to stay, causing negative repercussions throughout the organization. Acknowledging the lack of fit earlier in the selection process rather than later will save you money and time, as well as avoid the costs associated with reduced productivity and employee morale, and unhappy customers.

Here are eleven actions you can take to provide candidates for hire and/or promotion with a realistic job preview:

Before the interview:

  1. In the job posting and recruitment materials, be very clear about the negative as well as the positive aspects of the job and the organization.
  2. Encourage candidates to speak with employees or incumbents.
  3. When feasible, offer job shadow opportunities.
  4. Formulate interview questions that assess the alignment between candidates’ personal values and the organization’s values.

During the interview:

  1. Provide candidates with information about available career paths and realistic time frames for promotion.
  2. Ask candidates about their job expectations. When there are unrealistic perceptions, re-set them by explaining why they are improbable or unlikely.
  3. Ask job candidates why they want to work for your organization. If there are misconceptions, correct them on the spot.
  4. Provide interviewers with a list of job and organization positives and negatives to communicate clearly to each candidate.

After the interview:

  1. Review the interviewers’ notes carefully, noting any potential red flags that could indicate a candidate might not be a good fit – e.g., unacceptable behaviors, personal values that are at odds with those of the organization.
  2. Call candidates’ references. If any red flags were raised during the interview, ask questions to elicit information about whether they are well-founded.
  3. Speak with candidates before an offer is made to assess the accuracy of their understanding of the job and the organization. Correct any misperceptions.

While no one likes to lose otherwise good job candidates, hiring or promoting someone who is a poor fit for the job and/or the organization does a disservice to everyone. Who would you rather have serving your customers: people who went into the job with realistic expectations or those who are disillusioned because their expectations were not met?


To find other articles and resources that may be of value to you, I invite you to visit my web site at  www.BusinessAlignmentStrategies.com and my blog at www.OptimizeBusinessResults.com.


Alignment Solutions is a concise, bi-weekly newsletter written specifically to help organizational leaders optimize their business results. Your e-mail address is never shared with anyone for any reason. You may unsubscribe by clicking the link on the bottom of this e-mail.

Click here to Join Our Mailing List!

SM Icons
Line

© 2016 Pat Lynch. All rights reserved.

Alignment Solutions Newsletter: How to Re-set Unrealistic Workplace Expectations

Wednesday, December 9th, 2015

How to Re-set Unrealistic
Workplace Expectations

Alignment solution: You can set yourself and others up for success by re-setting unrealistic workplace expectations.

Unrealistic expectations have widespread negative repercussions in the workplace. They establish impossible standards that even high achievers who are consummate problem-solvers cannot meet. Yet people try anyway, often to their own and others’ detriment.

Employees trying to meet impossible standards may take short-cuts or give up altogether. As a result, morale drops, self-confidence plummets, resentment grows, trust (in oneself and each other) is eroded, and people begin to question their own competency. Stress increases when employees perceive that even heroic efforts are not good enough.

To re-set unrealistic expectations, there are two audiences you must address: yourself and your employees. Some actions to counter unrealistic expectations are common to both groups:

  1. Set reasonable expectations and standards up front.
  2. Quickly re-set impracticable expectations as they arise.
  3. De-bunk “facts” that reflect an altered reality.

Here are some audience-specific actions you can take to re-set unrealistic expectations:

Self:

  1. Develop a realistic mindset. Recognize and own the fact that you cannot do everything. Model that mindset through your language and your decisions.
  2. Distinguish clearly between what you can control and what you can’t. Focus on the former and release the latter. Teach others to do the same.
  3. Set reasonable goals for yourself – i.e., those that are attainable even though they may cause you to stretch.
  4. Resist the temptation to maintain a dual standard: an unrealistic one for yourself and another, realistic one for everyone else. People believe what you DO, not what you say. If you set yourself up for failure, you’re also doing so for others.

Employees:

  1. Establish a culture of resiliency that allows for “failure” and embraces mistakes as learning opportunities. Define “failure” as something other than an imperfect outcome.
  2. De-bunk the notion that 100% success is possible. Convey the message that not all projects or customer interactions will go perfectly despite everyone’s best efforts Replace this fallacy with the expectation that everyone will do everything possible within reason.
  3. When mistakes are made, have employees identify what they learned and how they can apply that knowledge in the future.
  4. When employees beat themselves up over a project or customer interaction that went badly, help them re-set their perceptions so they can remember what they did well, and the lessons they learned.

You can set yourself and others up for success by establishing realistic expectations and by consistently challenging those that are not. The workplace can be a stressful environment. Don’t make your and others’ jobs harder than necessary by setting, or allowing to others to create, impossible standards.


To find other articles and resources that may be of value to you, I invite you to visit my web site at www.BusinessAlignmentStrategies.com and my blog at www.OptimizeBusinessResults.com.


Alignment Solutions is a concise, bi-weekly newsletter written specifically to help organizational leaders optimize their business results. Your e-mail address is never shared with anyone for any reason. You may unsubscribe by clicking the link on the bottom of this e-mail.

Click here to Join Our Mailing List!

SM Icons
Line

© 2015 Pat Lynch. All rights reserved.